Senior engineer outsmarts an arrogant new hire when the newbie tries to play office politics, shattering his misplaced corporte confidence: 'He quit out of embarrassment'

Advertisement
  • Senior engineer teaching his apprentice the job.
  • The guy assigned to attack me did it in the wrong meeting. My career was spent as an applications engineer in the EDA (electronic design automation)
  • industry and my main function was doing tech support for electronics engineers using programmable logic devices which required a very complex implementation toolset, and so there was both hardware and software support involved.
  • Initially I was working in a small startup company and had taken on the role of also doing admin work for a bug tracking system for the implementation toolset development. I was tasked with
  • writing a scripted batch interface to the bug tracking system we had acquired, so that after bug review meetings, status changes could be batch loaded from a text file using a command line interface in Linux, and it worked out well.
  • A few years later, we were acquired by a much larger company in the bay area and that company replaced their own toolset with ours, and so also switched to our bug
  • tracking system. At the same time we started plans to migrate to a new bug tracking system. I wasn't going to be involved in the admin work for the new system, but because of my experience | was assigned to a group laying out the specs for the new system.
  • It turned out that the idea of having a command line interface for batch processing was controversial and the split was across site boundaries, not department boundaries. I was warned that I needed to be
  • prepared to speak up for the command line interface in any meetings pertaining to the new system. Then I learned that a specific engineer (new hire) in my division in CA had been assigned to argue against the
  • feature. I wasn't used to having to play politics, but I figured all I had to do was speak up about the benefits of having the feature that was already in heavy use in the old system.
  • Young engineer apprentice learning the ropes.
  • Then I was asked to do a training presentation for people that needed to come up to speed on the old and still current system, and the new hire was attending. I was going through all the
  • features and use cases. When I got to the section on using the command line interface, the new hire interrupts and says "I don't think we need a command line interface". I replied, "No, you've got it wrong. You're supposed to
  • argue against this feature in the new system. I'm just training you on using the existing system". His manager who was also in the training session told him to let me finish. He quit the job a few days later. I like to think he quit out of embarrassment.
  • notthelizardgenitals I would have quit out of embarrassment for allowing myself to get pulled into some messy kindergarten feud kind of BS! Thank you for sharing your story, it was very satisfying
  • OP bwade913 It was surprising that a new hire was put in that awkward position. I never did find out what that was about.
  • cheffromspace Thank you for creating and defending CLIS.
  • OP bwade913 Sadly the CLI did get axed in the end. The new company had a separate tools group that refused to develop and support it.
  • LowAcanthocephala251 Help me out here. Why is CLI preferred over whatever the alternative is (assuming GUI)?
  • OP bwade913 It's tedious and error prone to load each record individually and hand modify the various fields. Batch processing streamlined the processing. Command line driven custom reports were also a big part of it.
  • Tomocafe Small world... I know these companies. This must have been around 95 or 96. Interesting piece of history.
  • OP bwade913 It was a good company to work for. I was there more than twenty years until I retired.
  • ElectronicAvenger Back when the F-15 Eagle fighter was being initially designed and developed, it was envisioned with a completely new A/A missile system and nose gun. But when the first flying prototype was finished, it featured an existing and fully tested A/A missile and the M-61 Vulcan nose cannon. The thinking on this was 'The Tried and True to protect the New'. Punchline: it is not wise to ditch everything that works without fail just to push out a totally new system.
  • dsccsd00 What a satisfying read. Thanks for sharing, OP.
  • TriGurl Ha!! That's glorious!

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article